Family Asset Funds and Tax Liabilities Arising from Business Activities

A mortgage lien may be registered over assets contributed to a family asset fund (fondo patrimoniale) even where the underlying tax liability arises from the business or professional activities of either spouse.

The Italian Supreme Court reaffirmed this principle in Judgment No. 25114 of 8 September 2026, clarifying that the business origin of a debt is not, in itself, sufficient either to establish that it is connected with the family’s needs or, conversely, to prove that it is unrelated to them.

Under Article 170 of the Italian Civil Code, enforcement against the assets held in the fund and the income generated by them is precluded in respect of debts that the creditor knew had been incurred for purposes unrelated to the family’s needs. The decisive criterion is therefore not whether the obligation is personal, professional or business-related, but the specific relationship between the event giving rise to it and the needs of the family.

The Supreme Court adopts a particularly broad interpretation of family needs, encompassing not only the essential requirements of maintenance, housing and education, but also:

  • the family’s overall well-being;
  • the improvement of its financial position;
  • the development and enhancement of its members’ professional or business activities;
  • the pursuit of the lifestyle jointly chosen by the spouses.

Consequently, even a business activity aimed at generating resources exceeding the family’s essential needs may be regarded as serving those needs.

A debtor seeking to rely on the protection afforded by the fund must prove, on the basis of specific evidence:

  • that the particular obligation was incurred for purposes unrelated to the family’s needs;
  • that the creditor was aware of this lack of connection.

The Court further confirmed that a mortgage lien registered under Article 77 of Presidential Decree No. 602/1973 does not constitute an act of compulsory enforcement, but rather an autonomous protective measure serving both security and precautionary functions. Its registration over assets held in a family asset fund is therefore not prohibited outright, but remains subject to the conditions laid down in Article 170 of the Italian Civil Code.

Read the Judgment